 |
|

06-27-2008, 06:30 PM
|
 |
Times banned from Tug 4
TS4MS Master - 3000+ Posts!
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,652
TS4MS Points: 133,693
|
|
|
How To Walk Away (Renee) From a Paid-for Timeshare
Presented to stimulate discussion.
1. Start an LLC. ($104 in Missouri, with everything needed being available
online.)
2. Deed your timeshare(s) over to the LLC. (Maybe $30 in recording fee, per
timeshare.)
What are you looking for now (?), you're done.
So what if the LLC gets sued or there is a judgement against it; you gave it no assets or bank account. You are no longer personally liable.
__________________
18 years/100 Exchanges ~~~Exchanging/Searching/Florida/Kauai/CA/CO/MO/AR/IA/OK/OH/Consumer Advocacy/Estate Planning/Priceline/Sports/Boating/Fishing/Golf/Lake-living
|

06-27-2008, 06:55 PM
|
 |
Posting Member
1000+ Posts Club
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 1,059
TS4MS Points: 16,303
|
|
|
Unless the LLC was designed strictly as a measure to defraud someone or an entitiy (such as a timeshare HOA). I'd almost bet that you could find yourself in an expensive and tight situation somewhere down the line if it could be proven that the LLC was started with the sole purpose of shifting liabilities for the purpose of defaulting on them.
|

06-27-2008, 10:32 PM
|
 |
Times banned from Tug 4
TS4MS Master - 3000+ Posts!
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,652
TS4MS Points: 133,693
|
|
OK, then start it for another reason.
Then, down the road a piece, deed your timeshares to it.
__________________
18 years/100 Exchanges ~~~Exchanging/Searching/Florida/Kauai/CA/CO/MO/AR/IA/OK/OH/Consumer Advocacy/Estate Planning/Priceline/Sports/Boating/Fishing/Golf/Lake-living
|

06-27-2008, 10:39 PM
|
 |
Posting Member
2000+ Posts - Get a life Club
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,398
TS4MS Points: 47,913
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLB
OK, then start it for another reason.
Then, down the road a piece, deed your timeshares to it.

|
Very doubtful that would stand if challenged. As I understand (and I'm not a lawyer and only play one occasionally on threads such as this) an action such as this would suffice to "pierce the liability veil" around the other entity and expose the assets of the owner(s) to the creditors.
__________________
Steve Nelson
"Nihilists! Excuse me. I mean, say what you like about the tenets of National Socialism, Dude, at least it's an ethos." - Walter Sobchak
|

06-27-2008, 10:43 PM
|
 |
Moderator
TS4MS Master - 3000+ Posts!
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,433
TS4MS Points: 449,372
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dougp26364
Unless the LLC was designed strictly as a measure to defraud someone or an entitiy (such as a timeshare HOA). I'd almost bet that you could find yourself in an expensive and tight situation somewhere down the line if it could be proven that the LLC was started with the sole purpose of shifting liabilities for the purpose of defaulting on them.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by T. R. Oglodyte
Very doubtful that would stand if challenged. As I understand (and I'm not a lawyer and only play one occasionally on threads such as this) an action such as this would suffice to "pierce the liability veil" around the other entity and expose the assets of the owner(s) to the creditors.
|
A piercing liability theory called sham to perpetrate a fraud in order to make an individual personally liable for corporate/LLC debts.
|

06-28-2008, 12:22 AM
|
 |
Posting Member
1000+ Posts Club
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: DC Suburban
Posts: 1,610
TS4MS Points: 77,511
|
|
I am at total loss here
I think I accident get to a wrong planet
Jya-Ning
|

06-28-2008, 01:29 AM
|
 |
Posting Member
2000+ Posts - Get a life Club
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,398
TS4MS Points: 47,913
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mshatty
A piercing liability theory called sham to perpetrate a fraud in order to make an individual personally liable for corporate/LLC debts.
|
And the penalty would be more than a bar of soap in the mouth.
__________________
Steve Nelson
"Nihilists! Excuse me. I mean, say what you like about the tenets of National Socialism, Dude, at least it's an ethos." - Walter Sobchak
|

06-28-2008, 12:37 PM
|
 |
Times banned from Tug 4
TS4MS Master - 3000+ Posts!
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,652
TS4MS Points: 133,693
|
|
Well, I certainly would not want my veil pierced.
Asking from another angle, that of the HOA considering the expense involved in litigating against an owner (or group of owners), who (which) would you rather be facing, an (group of) individual(s), or a (group of) LLC(s)?
__________________
18 years/100 Exchanges ~~~Exchanging/Searching/Florida/Kauai/CA/CO/MO/AR/IA/OK/OH/Consumer Advocacy/Estate Planning/Priceline/Sports/Boating/Fishing/Golf/Lake-living
|

06-28-2008, 12:56 PM
|
 |
Moderator
2000+ Posts - Get a life Club
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: eastern Europe
Posts: 2,609
TS4MS Points: 128,726
|
|
|
Most HOA's are not going to get into anything more complex than a simple foreclosure, which costs their budgets enough as it is.
Most sensible HOA's quietly take deedbacks if asked, but wisely do not publicize this. That saves the much high costs and longer time period of foreclosure and is a win-win in a bad situation for both parties.
There are more creative deeding options than this, which can really screw up a title beyond repair, but I am not going to go into the details since I don't want to encourage such things. However, my late uncle was confronted with a small, almost worthless piece of land that his political adversaries in city hall learned that he owned and started mowing it and sending him the bill, although not mowing similar property on either side. To get rid of this headache he did some real creative deeding, that has been cited in Continuing Legal Education courses, and his former law partner still gets comments on it twenty some years later.
|

06-28-2008, 01:21 PM
|
 |
Moderator
TS4MS Master - 3000+ Posts!
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,433
TS4MS Points: 449,372
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLB
Well, I certainly would not want my veil pierced.
Asking from another angle, that of the HOA considering the expense involved in litigating against an owner (or group of owners), who (which) would you rather be facing, an (group of) individual(s), or a (group of) LLC(s)?
|
Cost is all the same. You just put them all in one basket and sort it out.
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Advertisements |
|
|
» December 2008 |
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
» TS4MS Stuff |
|
|
|