Timeshare Forums  

Go Back   Timeshare Forums
TS4MS Store Forum Navigation TS4MS Points

View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 02:11 PM
BocaBum99's Avatar
BocaBum99 BocaBum99 is offline
Moderator
TS4MS Master - 3000+ Posts!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hawaii Kai and Boca Raton
Posts: 4,308
TS4MS Points: 476,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by timeos2 View Post
I'm not focusing on that even though it is a critical part. When you hold the deed YOU vote for whatever Board/resort it is at. When the trust holds the deed you have no vote. If the Developer holds the management spot - deeded or not - that's another whammy against owners. Special assessments will always be the bane of condo's/timeshares - better to hold the power of the vote to at least have some say in the matter vs the developers/managements whims. Finally depending on FL statutes to protect your individual rights as an owner is a fantasy. They write great rules but if systems/resorts (hello Wastegate - is there a rule/regulation they haven't broken in Fl? And their not even a trust) choose to ignore them just try to get any action out of them. They and the developer know it costs big $$ to fight them and most owners aren't willing to spend that so they go on their merry way.

I would never - ever - own a non-deeded timeshare as its far too much power to those who simply want your money in a system already far too tilted toward developers/managers and away from the small owners.

As an example what absolute rights would the Trust "owners" (really lease holders) have if this plan goes through to modify the terms, rules or block it? None. Sure you could file a complaint but lots of luck with that going anywhere. If you buy into a trust based system you are putting all your faith in that system running to your satisfaction. If not you have zero rights to change it - your choice is to get out. They could care less as they can resell it. Not a position I want to be in with my upfront buy in to whatever system it may be.
In Bluegreen, all owners get a vote. Not sure what you mean by that.

I haven't seen your whole argument, but I think you are putting way too much emphasis on deeded week vs. held in trust. I see very little difference in legal structure, owners rights and recourse should the board be controlled by a power entity.

Let's look at Fairfield. Lots of those ownerships are deeded and Wyndham still made them worthless. At this point, I believe WorldMark is way better than Fairfield. And, WorldMark is the penultimate in deeded trust.

If you are looking at Westgate, they would be like they are independently of who held the deeds.
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisements
» Current Poll
Can you upload without an error
Yes - 86.21%
25 Votes
No, I get an error (PLEASE POST THE ERROR MESSAGE!) - 13.79%
4 Votes
Total Votes: 29
You may not vote on this poll.
» November 2008
S M T W T F S
262728293031 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 123456
» TS4MS Stuff

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
TimeshareForums.com and TS4MS are copyrighted by Quarterbore Inc 2006.